The real effects of saying not everything has to be accessible

tooth-and-nails:

You are disabled. You go to a meeting about an activity you’re interested in. There is no way for you to physically enter the building unassisted. There are no funds to change that. They tell you “Not everything has to be accessible. Go try something else”

You are disabled. You go to a meeting about an activity you’re
interested in.
Your accommodations slow down and affect others enjoyment. Other members tell you that your accommodations are special treatment and unfair on the rest. They tell you “Not
everything has to be accessible. Go try something else”

You are disabled. You go to a meeting about an activity you’re
interested in.
Members probe your medical history. Some are scared of your conditions and appearance.

Members deliberately test and provoke your conditions for laughs. You are called a faker and a tax burden.

They tell you “Not
everything has to be accessible. Go try something else”

You are disabled. You go to a meeting about an activity you’re
interested in. Members refuse to help you because they don’t think the disabled are capable of this activity. They tell you “Not
everything has to be accessible. Go try something else”

You are disabled. You cannot drive or take public transport to the event. You stay at home.

You are disabled. Your irregular attendance due to health is seen as a detriment. You stay at home.

You are disabled. You realise very few groups will accept you because they think its fine to turn you away because others must accept you, right?

You stay at home.